'Instead of being moved by Christ's suffering or awed by his sacrifice, I felt abused by a filmmaker intent on punishing an audience, for who knows what sins.' 'The relentless gore is self-defeating,' he writes. Take it or leave it.ĭavid Ansen, a critic I respect, finds in Newsweek that Gibson has gone too far. This is not a sermon or a homily, but a visualization of the central event in the Christian religion.

That his film is superficial in terms of the surrounding message - that we get only a few passing references to the teachings of Jesus - is, I suppose, not the point. What Gibson has provided for me, for the first time in my life, is a visceral idea of what the Passion consisted of. Christ suffered, Christ died, Christ rose again, we were redeemed, and let's hope we can get home in time to watch the Illinois basketball game on TV. As an altar boy, serving during the Stations on Friday nights in Lent, I was encouraged to meditate on Christ's suffering, and I remember the chants as the priest led the way from one station to another:įor we altar boys, this was not necessarily a deep spiritual experience.

Anyone raised as a Catholic will be familiar with the stops along the way the screenplay is inspired not so much by the Gospels as by the 14 Stations of the Cross. It is clear that Mel Gibson wanted to make graphic and inescapable the price that Jesus paid (as Christians believe) when he died for our sins.

I prefer to evaluate a film on the basis of what it intends to do, not on what I think it should have done.

Where can i watch passion of the christ